Should “Hispanic” be a race?
*First off, this shouldn’t be a serious question. Second, the answer is no. Third, who is “Jane the Actuary.” Fourth, give this piece a chance, Jane says there should be a U.S. Census category for “person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America.” It’s like American Indian, but without the tribal affiliation requirement. She’d call it “Indigenous American.” The more European “Hispanics” can identify as white; Caribbean Latinos may chose to identify as “Black.” The idea is that “Latinos” are indigenous to the American continent. What do you think? VL
By Jane the Actuary, Patheos (4.5 minute read)
Or, more precisely,[tweet_dis] should the US Census Bureau’s racial categories include as a “race” the characteristic of having ancestors predominantly indigenous Central or South American?[/tweet_dis] Or take the existing definition of “American Indian”, which reads, “A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America) and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment,” remove the requirement for “tribal affiliation or community attachment,” and rename it “Indigenous American”? (Numbers of “true American Indians” could still be determined by looking at tribal rolls.)
Read more NewsTaco stories on Facebook. >>
Because right now, there is no census definition that properly covers individuals of Mexican or Latin American origin. READ MORE
[Photo courtesy of U..S. Army]
Ssuggested reading